Tag: midnuptial


Mid-Nuptial Agreements in Pennsylvania – An Explanation

Posted by – September 5, 2012

The Pennsylvania Divorce Code specifically recognizes agreements entered into “before, during and after” the marriage.  A mid-nuptial agreement is entered during the marriage but is otherwise similar in effect to a prenuptial agreement.  Because a mid-nuptial agreement is entered after the marriage occurred, it technically is and is sometimes referred to as, a post-nuptial agreement.  Generally speaking however a post-nuptial agreement is thought of as a final settlement agreement and is often referred to as a marital settlement agreement or a property settlement agreement.

Mid-nuptial agreements are not anywhere near as common as prenups or postnups.  Sometimes they are entered because a parent is intending to make a large gift, perhaps in the context of estate planning, to the Husband or Wife, such as an interest in a business or a piece of real estate, and there is a desire to keep that asset “in the family.”  In this limited type of agreement a spouse will be asked to give up all rights in that particular asset but will not be asked to give up rights in any other marital assets such as rights to alimony or equitable distribution of other assets, etc.

The other circumstance that gives rise to consideration of a mid-nuptial agreement is when a couple may be having marital difficulties but neither party has decided to proceed with the divorce and both parties want to try and make efforts to save the marriage.  However, they don’t want to be emotionally burdened with might happen to their assets if they fail to reconcile and so they decide up front that in the event they subsequently break up (six weeks, six months or six years later) the agreement will set forth how the economic issues will be resolved.  While one hopes that both parties enter into the negotiations for such an agreement in good faith, the private motivations of any individual can never be ascertained with certainty.  Nevertheless, mid-nuptial agreements still require, for enforceability purposes, the same formality and tests as a prenuptial agreement i.e. clarity in drafting and full and fair financial disclosure.  There is one additional requirement for an enforceable mid-nuptial agreement.  While a prenuptial agreement does not require any extra consideration other than the occurrence of the marriage itself, a mid-nuptial agreement, being entered into after the marriage has already occurred, requires separate and real consideration to be given to the spouse who may be surrendering certain rights.  A discussion of the type of consideration is beyond the scope of this blog.

Agreements and their role in family law disputes

Posted by – August 29, 2012

The vast majority of disputes in any family law matter are settled by an agreement.  This doesn’t mean there won’t be any litigation, but ultimately most issues in the majority of cases get resolved by an agreement, whether it be a custody agreement, a child support agreement, an agreement on the interim and exclusive use of the marital residence, an agreement for advance partial distribution of assets, or an overall comprehensive property settlement agreement (often referred to as a marital settlement agreement or a postnuptial agreement which generally encompasses many issues, all of which have been ultimately agreed upon and reduced to a written agreement).

Other types of agreements are entered into not because the alternative is litigation but in order to avoid future disagreements.  The most well known of this type of agreement is a prenuptial agreement which is entered into before a marriage and is intended to set forth in advance how economic issues will be resolved in the event of a divorce or in the event of death of one of the parties.  A midnuptial agreement is similar in many respects to a prenuptial agreement however it is entered during the marriage and can serve similar purposes to a prenuptial agreement.  Finally, Pennsylvania recognizes cohabitation agreements which are entered into by couples who do not intend to get married or are prohibited by law from getting married (for example same sex couples) but who wish to establish their rights, for example in real estate they intend to purchase together or that one party intends to purchase for both of the parties to live in, in the event the couple later breaks up.